If the media did not mobilize people and alert the snake, so what if he ran to the horizon? He would not strangle the child and bury the body.
If he were given time and allowed to calm down, he might have handled the child properly, but now the frightened bird can only break its bridges and risk everything. He might commit suicide for fear of crime. What if his child dies?
If the media could calm down and not flock to the news simply to snatch the news launch, perhaps the children would not have gone to heaven so early.
I would like to ask, when the public security police were secretly investigating and waiting to arrest a criminal suspect, when has the media reported it in advance?
We need to think more: This was an ordinary theft case. Because the law enforcement agencies and the media were unprofessional, they clamored for arrest all over the world, and there was no goodwill persuasion and persuasion to the criminal suspect, they took risks and the tragedy occurred. Also, don't the child's parents have guardianship responsibilities? Why not take this opportunity to tell more parents the painful lesson? To avoid the recurrence of the tragedy and dilute social costs?
I thought of Bai Xiaoyan's kidnapping and murder case, which was also due to over-reporting by the media, which caused the kidnappers to jump over the wall in desperation.
If people working in the media in China have a utilitarian attitude, first-mover and news-grabbing attitude, instead of having a calm mind and meticulous thinking. Then the media people have really become the watchdog of XX. This is not something that a media person or a media person can change. Once again, today's media needs brains and conscience.